<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>islington leaseholder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>a voice for Islington's social sector leaseholders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='leaseholders.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="islington leaseholder" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Ilag wins case at tribunal</title>
		<link>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/ilag-wins-case-at-tribunal/</link>
		<comments>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/ilag-wins-case-at-tribunal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiscali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/ilag-wins-case-at-tribunal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Islington Leaseholders Action Group (Ilag) has won its case against the London Borough of Islington over a charge for a leaseholders&#8217; association. The judgement of the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal is available here: (lvtresult.pdf) Leaseholders would like to give special thanks to Mr Francis Davey, a barrister at Temple Chambers specialising in housing and leasehold issues, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=leaseholders.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1669121&amp;post=68&amp;subd=leaseholders&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/ilag-wins-case-at-tribunal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/8abaa8af2c3d434349fd9f9c643614e5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tiscali</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A voice for London&#8217;s leaseholders</title>
		<link>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/08/a-voice-for-londons-leaseholders/</link>
		<comments>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/08/a-voice-for-londons-leaseholders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiscali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/08/a-voice-for-londons-leaseholders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The London Leaseholders Network (LLN) is a group of social sector leaseholders from about 15 of London’s 32 boroughs who meet every month to discuss mutual issues of concern.  Those issues range from particular problems experienced dealing with social sector landlords to policy recommendations to government. &#160; In the past, LLN members have: served on the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=leaseholders.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1669121&amp;post=64&amp;subd=leaseholders&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/08/a-voice-for-londons-leaseholders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/8abaa8af2c3d434349fd9f9c643614e5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tiscali</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psychoanalysts&#8217; charges to go on our bills</title>
		<link>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/psychoanalysts-charges-to-go-on-our-bills/</link>
		<comments>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/psychoanalysts-charges-to-go-on-our-bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiscali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/psychoanalysts-charges-to-go-on-our-bills/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ilag&#8217;s case against a charge for a leaseholders&#8217; association was heard last week.  Islington Council put forward a case which could leave us facing even higher charges for pyschoanalysts, jugglers and masseurs. Here we have written to Mr Anthony Essien, chief executive of the Leasehold Advisory Service, setting out the implications if the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=leaseholders.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1669121&amp;post=58&amp;subd=leaseholders&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/psychoanalysts-charges-to-go-on-our-bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/8abaa8af2c3d434349fd9f9c643614e5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tiscali</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HFI owes us millions</title>
		<link>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/hfi-cock-up-means-were-owed-millions/</link>
		<comments>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/hfi-cock-up-means-were-owed-millions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiscali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/hfi-cock-up-means-were-owed-millions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Islington Council leaseholders who have paid any bill for major works in the twenty years before 2003 could get their money back. This is because of a landmark ruling by the Lands Tribunal in August.  In a case involving Islington Council, the tribunal ruled the authority&#8217;s consultation process was flawed.  It said the council failed to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=leaseholders.wordpress.com&amp;blog=1669121&amp;post=4&amp;subd=leaseholders&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://leaseholders.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/hfi-cock-up-means-were-owed-millions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/8abaa8af2c3d434349fd9f9c643614e5?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tiscali</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
